Dnia 2014-01-26, o godz. 21:35:27 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> napisał(a):
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:21:44 -0800 > Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Sorry, I work on Portage. What I'm saying is that We are free to > > change the behavior of *portage* now; rather than waiting for a new > > EAPI. If an ebuild needs to define EAPI=eapi-next to 'correctly' use > > XDG_*, well that is someone else's can of worms. > > Changing Portage to hide the issue is a bad idea, since it makes it > harder for developers to notice that that's a problem they need to fix. > Although maybe you could set XDG_* to something that will give a big > noisy sandbox violation for current EAPIs? Yes, because instantly breaking a few dozen ebuilds in stable tree for the sake of proving a point is always a good idea. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
