Mike Gilbert wrote: > It would really nice to have a solution for the few users who do > have this set that does not involve adding code to random eclasses, > or leaving things broken for X months/years until all ebuilds can > be bumped to EAPI 6.
Is there any other solution for users than fixing the ebuilds and/or eclass(es)? Maybe one way to get things fixed would be to add a QA warning encouraging users to file bugs? //Peter
