11.08.2015 16:36, Rich Freeman пишет: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sergey Popov <pinkb...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> 11.08.2015 16:11, James Le Cuirot пишет: >>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:58:49 +0300 >>> Sergey Popov <pinkb...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> >>>> If both of flags are not set - we stick to default. >>>> Should this be set in EVERY ebuild explicitly? >>>> >>>> Maybe provide some sugar like $(qt_use_default qtgui 5), where >>>> qt_use_default is the name of function, qtgui is the package and 5 is >>>> the slot for default choice, where either BOTH of flags(qt4, qt5) are >>>> enabled or disabled >>> >>> That sounds a little bit like what I suggested earlier. >>> >>> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/884257a2d924a51851d629b1dc9b30df >>> >> >> But without introducing brand new useless USE flag. Which makes huge >> difference to me :-) >> > > If we want the typical user to not set either qt4 or qt5, are we > saying that any package that could use either always enable one of > them by default? Then all users get a GUI by default, and then users > have to explicitly disable it? That seems to be the opposite of how > we normally do things, but it does let you get away from having lots > of users turning on qt.
I suggested this for packages, where GUI can not be disabled AND it should be either qt4 or qt5. Then, if we do not add + to USE description, users without anything in make.conf just run the blocker -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
