On 01.11.2015 20:23, hasufell wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 06:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull
>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator
>> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work.
>> Here's a few examples of how things could work:
>> General post-commit review:
>> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/rGENTOO27ba62d0c7fcabdc79ce82a064b43d67b3b11cca
>> Tracking commits with issues that need attention:
>> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/audit/query/open/
>> Pre-commit review: http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/D1
>> Phabricator also has all sorts of fancy (optional) features that could
>> be useful for collaborative development (see http://phabricator.org/ for
>> more info).
>> What do you think?
> phabricator is horrible. I'll definitely use it less (if at all) than
> bugzilla.

On 10.10.2015 16:15, Julian Ospald wrote:
> That's a great start for us, having developers announce publicly that
> they will ignore our project or require us to create bugs for every
> missing "|| die" in an ebuild.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to