On 11/01/2015 08:50 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > On 01.11.2015 20:23, hasufell wrote: >> On 11/01/2015 06:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull >>> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator >>> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work. >>> >>> Here's a few examples of how things could work: >>> >>> General post-commit review: >>> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/rGENTOO27ba62d0c7fcabdc79ce82a064b43d67b3b11cca >>> >>> Tracking commits with issues that need attention: >>> http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/audit/query/open/ >>> >>> Pre-commit review: http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/D1 >>> >>> Phabricator also has all sorts of fancy (optional) features that could >>> be useful for collaborative development (see http://phabricator.org/ for >>> more info). >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> >> >> phabricator is horrible. I'll definitely use it less (if at all) than >> bugzilla. >> > > On 10.10.2015 16:15, Julian Ospald wrote: >> That's a great start for us, having developers announce publicly that >> they will ignore our project or require us to create bugs for every >> missing "|| die" in an ebuild. > > *chuckles* > >
I don't know how you confuse your ignorant behavior of blacklisting a whole project with the liberty of gentoo developers to choose the contribution platform which fits best for their use case (be it email, IRC, bugzilla, phabricator or github). But I didn't expect any different behavior from you. I think you should re-read our CoC and stop posting mails that are just flame.