On 09/07/18 23:12, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/09/2018 02:34 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> I'd mostly argue any such change should only affect new systems >> > Yes, changing defaults for existing systems would be annoying. > > My recommendation is to have catalyst set the new defaults in the stage > tarballs. > > When sys-apps/portage changes its internal defaults, I'd like for the > upgrade process to call a tool that generates configuration files when > necessary to ensure that the existing paths remain constant. I think it should be possible for RelEng to make a start on catalyst updates - is there anything that would inhibit going ahead with this, potentially?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature