On 07/09/2018 03:27 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 09/07/18 23:12, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 07/09/2018 02:34 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >>> I'd mostly argue any such change should only affect new systems >>> >> Yes, changing defaults for existing systems would be annoying. >> >> My recommendation is to have catalyst set the new defaults in the stage >> tarballs. >> >> When sys-apps/portage changes its internal defaults, I'd like for the >> upgrade process to call a tool that generates configuration files when >> necessary to ensure that the existing paths remain constant. > I think it should be possible for RelEng to make a start on catalyst > updates - is there anything that would inhibit going ahead with this, > potentially?
No, nothing. Whatever catalyst puts it the default config will become our new default. -- Thanks, Zac
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
