On 3/22/2019 4:32 PM, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to propose doing the following:
> - Keywording elogind on missing archs
> - Making elogind a global USE flag
> - Switching desktop profiles to elogind from consolekit while still
> preserving -suid +elogind on xorg-server for those that does not use
> desktop profiles (systemd profiles users not affected)
> - Making pambase always install the configuration for pam_elogind.so,
> the same way it does for pam_gnome_keyring.so at this very moment,
> effectively removing elogind USE flag from it.
> What do you all think about?
> -- Piotr.

What are the implications, if any, of using DMs which are not aware of
{,e}logind?  Do they work without modification?

Afaik, only sddm or, now, gdm even have an elogind USE flag.

All other DMs have consolekit support but unknown elogind status.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to