On 3/22/2019 4:32 PM, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose doing the following: > > - Keywording elogind on missing archs > - Making elogind a global USE flag > - Switching desktop profiles to elogind from consolekit while still > preserving -suid +elogind on xorg-server for those that does not use > desktop profiles (systemd profiles users not affected) > - Making pambase always install the configuration for pam_elogind.so, > the same way it does for pam_gnome_keyring.so at this very moment, > effectively removing elogind USE flag from it. > > What do you all think about? > > -- Piotr. >
What are the implications, if any, of using DMs which are not aware of
{,e}logind? Do they work without modification?
Afaik, only sddm or, now, gdm even have an elogind USE flag.
All other DMs have consolekit support but unknown elogind status.
Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
