Hello Reg, Isn't that what's wanted?
It avoids bootstrapping. j reg hughson said: > emerge -e world > > should re-emerge your entire system. > > On May 30, 2003 10:32 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote: >> Hello Mike, >> >> Have u tried -e = empty tree? >> >> j >> >> Mike Bohan said: >> > When run with world, it does in fact display many dependencies. >> > However, system only displays two. >> > >> > >> > diesel root # emerge -up --deep system >> > >> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: >> > >> > Calculating system dependencies ...done! >> > [ebuild U ] dev-python/python-fchksum-1.6.1-r1 [1.6.1] >> > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.3-r1 [1.3.1] >> > >> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 22:00, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: >> >> What does emerge -u --deep system (or world) -p give? >> >> >> >> > This is only somewhat related, but it sparked a question in my >> mind. >> >> >> >> How does one rebuild the entire system/world if all the packages >> are already up to date? >> >> >> >> > For example, my system reports... >> >> > >> >> > diesel root # emerge system >> >> > Calculating system dependencies ...done! >> >> > >> >> > >>> Auto-cleaning packages ... >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. >> >> > >> >> > * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > If I upgrade to gcc 3.3, it'd make sense to rebuild the entire >> >> >> >> system. Is the only solution to rerun bootstrap.sh? If this is the >> case, is there a solution to rebuild all the world packages (even >> if they're up to date as well) without manually specifying them on >> the 'emerge line'? Thanks in advance! >> >> >> >> > -Mike Bohan >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 18:56, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: >> >> > > On Friday 30 May 2003 22:53, Harald Arnesen wrote: >> >> > > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> writes: >> >> > > > >> has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be >> implications >> >> >> >> or undesired side effects from rebuilding my system? is >> >> there direct confliction with glibc? i doubt it. any >> >> suggestions from anyone who has more knowledge than i do >> >> would be well appreciated :-) >> >> >> >> > > > > I have an Athlon XP and rebuild alsmost my whole system >> with >> >> >> >> gcc 3.3. >> >> >> >> > > > > KDE, QT, X, xine, xmms, most of the packages in 'system' >> like >> >> >> >> bash, tar, textutil, libtool, awk,sed, grep... >> >> >> >> > > > > Gcc 3.3 is fast.. and I had no problems so far, but I have >> not >> >> >> >> tried to build a kernel yet. >> >> >> >> > > > I have built 2.5.69 and 2.5.70 on an K6-2 with gcc-3.3. Seems >> to >> >> >> >> work fine (for me). No crashes yet, with 2.5.69 I had an uptime of >> a couple of weeks, before I booted to 2.5.70 three days ago. >> >> >> >> > > 2.5.6X is still a nono for me.. every version freezes my system >> at >> >> >> >> bootup.. and 2.4.21-rc* is fine for me. >> >> >> >> > > Gl�ck Auf >> >> > > Volker >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list >> > >> > -- >> > Mike Bohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> -- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------ > Microsoft / Intel free > ------------------------ > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
