Hey J. I assume that's exactly what he wanted. Was just explaining what 'empty tree' would do for him...ask least what I think 'empty tree' will do for him.
On May 30, 2003 10:54 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote: > Hello Reg, > > Isn't that what's wanted? > > It avoids bootstrapping. > > j > > reg hughson said: > > emerge -e world > > > > should re-emerge your entire system. > > > > On May 30, 2003 10:32 pm, Jesse Jacobs wrote: > >> Hello Mike, > >> > >> Have u tried -e = empty tree? > >> > >> j > >> > >> Mike Bohan said: > >> > When run with world, it does in fact display many dependencies. > >> > However, system only displays two. > >> > > >> > > >> > diesel root # emerge -up --deep system > >> > > >> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > >> > > >> > Calculating system dependencies ...done! > >> > [ebuild U ] dev-python/python-fchksum-1.6.1-r1 [1.6.1] > >> > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.3-r1 [1.3.1] > >> > > >> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 22:00, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > >> >> What does emerge -u --deep system (or world) -p give? > >> >> > >> >> > This is only somewhat related, but it sparked a question in my > >> > >> mind. > >> > >> >> How does one rebuild the entire system/world if all the packages > >> > >> are already up to date? > >> > >> >> > For example, my system reports... > >> >> > > >> >> > diesel root # emerge system > >> >> > Calculating system dependencies ...done! > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> Auto-cleaning packages ... > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. > >> >> > > >> >> > * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > If I upgrade to gcc 3.3, it'd make sense to rebuild the entire > >> >> > >> >> system. Is the only solution to rerun bootstrap.sh? If this is the > >> > >> case, is there a solution to rebuild all the world packages (even > >> if they're up to date as well) without manually specifying them on > >> the 'emerge line'? Thanks in advance! > >> > >> >> > -Mike Bohan > >> >> > > >> >> > On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 18:56, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > >> >> > > On Friday 30 May 2003 22:53, Harald Arnesen wrote: > >> >> > > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> >> writes: > >> >> > > > >> has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet? what would be > >> > >> implications > >> > >> >> or undesired side effects from rebuilding my system? is > >> >> there direct confliction with glibc? i doubt it. any > >> >> suggestions from anyone who has more knowledge than i do > >> >> would be well appreciated :-) > >> >> > >> >> > > > > I have an Athlon XP and rebuild alsmost my whole system > >> > >> with > >> > >> >> gcc 3.3. > >> >> > >> >> > > > > KDE, QT, X, xine, xmms, most of the packages in 'system' > >> > >> like > >> > >> >> bash, tar, textutil, libtool, awk,sed, grep... > >> >> > >> >> > > > > Gcc 3.3 is fast.. and I had no problems so far, but I have > >> > >> not > >> > >> >> tried to build a kernel yet. > >> >> > >> >> > > > I have built 2.5.69 and 2.5.70 on an K6-2 with gcc-3.3. Seems > >> > >> to > >> > >> >> work fine (for me). No crashes yet, with 2.5.69 I had an uptime of > >> > >> a couple of weeks, before I booted to 2.5.70 three days ago. > >> > >> >> > > 2.5.6X is still a nono for me.. every version freezes my system > >> > >> at > >> > >> >> bootup.. and 2.4.21-rc* is fine for me. > >> >> > >> >> > > Gl�ck Auf > >> >> > > Volker > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Mike Bohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> -- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------ > > Microsoft / Intel free > > ------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------ Microsoft / Intel free ------------------------ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
