On 2010-07-02, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:19:36 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > >> Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change >> what happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" >> to contain his address as well as the list address so that he gets a >> direct response and doesn't have to bother to check the mailing list >> for replies. > > So he wants other people to take the trouble to reply, but he won't take > the trouble to look for the replies?
That's the way it read to me. If that's not what the OP meant, then I apologize for misunderstanding what he wrote. > If he really finds it so difficult to look for replies to his mails > (some mailers will highlight them), he could always set up a filter > to copy replies to him to his mailbox. Yup. Since the mailing list is already sending him a reply, why he wants a second one is beyond me. > You don't always need everyone else to change to get what you want. Well, I know some people who are like that... -- Grant
