On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017-04-25 19:59, R0b0t1 <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Danny YUE <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 2017-04-25 14:29, lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement >>>> which is at least as good as FTP? >>>> >>>> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and >>>> missing features. >>> >>> What about sshfs? It allows you to mount a location that can be accessed >>> via ssh to your local file system, as if you are using ssh. >>> >> >> In a similar vein, scp. > > And considering something still robust but a little more smart, rsync. >
I was actually going to come back and suggest rscync over ssh. I didn't originally mention it because I typically associate rsync with backups.
