On 2017-04-26 20:25, R0b0t1 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 2017-04-25 19:59, R0b0t1 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Danny YUE <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2017-04-25 14:29, lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement >>>>> which is at least as good as FTP? >>>>> >>>>> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and >>>>> missing features. >>>> >>>> What about sshfs? It allows you to mount a location that can be accessed >>>> via ssh to your local file system, as if you are using ssh. >>>> >>> >>> In a similar vein, scp. >> >> And considering something still robust but a little more smart, rsync. >> > > I was actually going to come back and suggest rscync over ssh. I > didn't originally mention it because I typically associate rsync with > backups.
I recently found that rsnapshot (based on rsync) is a good and solid tool for backup...You may try it out ;-)
