Poster's note : if this is real, it will create quite a fuss. Some humble
pie will be eaten, but I'm not sure by whom.

http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979213500732

Q.-B. LU, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B DOI: 10.1142/S0217979213500732

COSMIC-RAY-DRIVEN REACTION AND GREENHOUSE EFFECT OF HALOGENATED MOLECULES:
CULPRITS FOR ATMOSPHERIC OZONE DEPLETION AND GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

Q.-B. LUDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and Departments of Biology and
Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaReceived: 15
October 2012Revised: 27 February 2013Accepted: 12 March 2013Published: 30
May 2013This study is focused on the effects of cosmic rays (solar
activity) and halogen-containing molecules (mainly chlorofluorocarbons —
CFCs) on atmospheric ozone depletion and global climate change. Brief
reviews are first given on the cosmic-ray-driven electron-induced-reaction
(CRE) theory forO3 depletion and the warming theory of halogenated
molecules for climate change. Then natural and anthropogenic contributions
to these phenomena are examined in detail and separated well through
in-depth statistical analyses of comprehensive measured datasets of
quantities, including cosmic rays (CRs), total solar irradiance, sunspot
number, halogenated gases (CFCs, CCl4 and HCFCs), CO2, total O3, lower
stratospheric temperatures and global surface temperatures.
For O3 depletion, it is shown that an analytical equation derived from the
CRE theory reproduces well 11-year cyclic variations of both polar O3 loss
and stratospheric cooling, and new statistical analyses of the CRE equation
with observed data of total O3 and stratospheric temperature give high
linear correlation coefficients ≥ 0.92. After the removal of the CR effect,
a pronounced recovery by 20~25% of the Antarctic O3 hole is found, while no
recovery of O3 loss in mid-latitudes has been observed. These results show
both the correctness and dominance of the CRE mechanism and the success of
the Montreal Protocol. For global climate change, in-depth analyses of the
observed data clearly show that the solar effect and human-made halogenated
gases played the dominant role in Earth's climate change prior to and after
1970, respectively. Remarkably, a statistical analysis gives a nearly zero
correlation coefficient (R = -0.05) between corrected global surface
temperature data by removing the solar effect and CO2 concentration during
1850–1970. In striking contrast, a nearly perfect linear correlation with
coefficients as high as 0.96–0.97 is found between corrected or uncorrected
global surface temperature and total amount of stratospheric halogenated
gases during 1970–2012. Furthermore, a new theoretical calculation on the
greenhouse effect of halogenated gases shows that they (mainly CFCs) could
alone result in the global surface temperature rise of ~0.6°C in 1970–2002.
These results provide solid evidence that recent global warming was indeed
caused by the greenhouse effect of anthropogenic halogenated gases. Thus, a
slow reversal of global temperature to the 1950 value is predicted for
coming 5~7 decades. It is also expected that the global sea level will
continue to rise in coming 1~2 decades until the effect of the global
temperature recovery dominates over that of the polar O3hole recovery;
after that, both will drop concurrently. All the observed, analytical and
theoretical results presented lead to a convincing conclusion that both the
CRE mechanism and the CFC-warming mechanism not only provide new
fundamental understandings of the O3 hole and global climate change but
have superior predictive capabilities, compared with the conventional
models.

Keywords: Cosmic rays; chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs); ozone depletion; ozone
hole; global warming; global cooling

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to