This seems plausible , but a comperable if not greater environmental impact may arise from another emission from the same vessels- while the deliberate release of 100 tonnes of iron off the Haida coast by the Planktos organization has been widely condemned , nobody seems to notice the far larger tonnage of iron streaming into the ocean as the steel hulls of millions of tonnes of shipping reacy with sea water and their own acidic exhaust.
I noted ths de facto ocean fertilization in a note in* Science* online in 2008: - http://www.sciencemag.org/content/318/5855/1368.full/reply#sci_el_10731<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/318/5855/1368.full/reply#sci_el_10731> Russell Seitz On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 6:14:13 PM UTC-5, Greg Rau wrote: > > Thanks, Oscar. However, this problem would seem to pale in comparison to > CO2 acidification with an ocean input of about 8 GT (vs the stated MTs of > SOX and NOx). Also, probably dwarfed by SOx and NOx from land based > generation. Speaking of seawater scrubbing, this is also commonly done at > power plants (esp Asia) - good for air but very efficiently acidifies the > ocean. Solution - place limestone downstream of the gas/seawater > contacting. You could do the same for ships if they were wiling to > sacrifice some cargo tonnage for limestone. > Greg > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [ > [email protected] <javascript:>] on behalf of Oscar Escobar [ > [email protected] <javascript:>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 12, 2014 1:00 PM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:> > *Subject:* [geo] Shipping emissions can lead to high local ocean > acidification > > Strong acids formed from shipping emissions can produce seasonal ‘hot > spots’ of > ocean acidification, a recent study finds. These hot spots, in ocean areas > close to > busy shipping lanes, could have negative effects on local marine ecology > and > commercially farmed seafood species. > > Shipping emissions can lead to high local > ocean acidification > > Oceans have become more acidic since pre-industrial times. The average > global ocean pH – > which decreases with increasing acidity – has dropped by 0.1 because the > seas have > absorbed 30-40% of manmade CO2. However, it is not only CO2 that can > acidify oceans. > Shipping emissions, a significant source of atmospheric pollution, > annually release around > 9.5 million metric tons of sulphur and 16.2 million metric tons of nitric > oxides. > > When dissolved in seawater, these pollutants are converted into the strong > sulphuric and > nitric acids, adding to ocean acidification. Increasing acidity poses a > threat to marine > ecosystems, harming species such as coral and algae, as well as commercial > aquaculture > species, such as shellfish. > > The researchers used state of the art computer modelling techniques and > datasets to create > a high resolution simulation of global shipping emissions’ effects on > ocean acidity. The > simulation calculated the acidifying impacts of shipping sulphur and > nitric oxide emissions on > a month by month basis, over one year. In addition to shipping-related > influences on acidity, > the model also included many physical and environmental factors, such as > ocean surface > water mixing and atmospheric effects. > > The results agreed with previous studies of the average annual ocean > acidification, but, > importantly, revealed significant differences between regions and seasons. > Ocean > acidification was highest in the northern hemisphere, occurring in ‘hot > spots’ close to coastal > areas and busy shipping lanes during the summer months. These ‘hot spots’ > coincide with > peak activity of some biological processes, such as plankton blooms and > fish hatching, > where they may cause greater harm. On a local scale, the acidification – a > pH drop of > 0.0015-0.0020 – was equal to CO2’s global annual acidifying effects. > > The model did not include some coastal ocean areas, such as the > Mediterranean Sea, as > there were limitations in the oceanographic atlases used. However, > acidification is likely to > be high in these areas given the heavy shipping traffic from ports. > > International regulation is in place to reduce shipping atmospheric > sulphur emissions > through the International Maritime Organization’s Emission Control Areas > (ECA), which are > in force in four ocean areas, including the Baltic and North Seas. One > technology commonly > used to achieve ECA targets is ‘seawater scrubbing’, where exhaust > pollutants are removed > using seawater. > > This study drew on data from 2000 and 2002, prior to the enforcement of > ECAs. However, > the researchers note that seawater scrubbing, without additional steps to > neutralise the > acids that it produces, causes acidification in regions where biodiversity > or commercial > aquaculture may be most negatively affected. These previously overlooked > sources of ocean > acidification and policy impacts could be used to inform future > discussions of controls > relating to shipping emissions or ocean acidification > > The study: > > *Shipping contributes to ocean acidification* > Ida-Maja Hassellöv et al DOI: 10.1002/grl.50521 > http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50521/full > http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50521/abstract > > Abstract > > [1] The potential effect on surface water pH of emissions of SO*X* and NO > *X* from global ship routes is assessed. The results indicate that > regional pH reductions of the same order of magnitude as the CO2-driven > acidification can occur in heavily trafficked waters. These findings have > important consequences for ocean chemistry, since the sulfuric and nitric > acids formed are strong acids in contrast to the weak carbonic acid formed > by dissolution of CO2. Our results also provide background for discussion > of expanded controls to mitigate acidification due to these shipping > emissions. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
