Well, some olivine dust has caused a little storm, happy to see that it is 
taken seriously. Some people are asking questions for which some answers are 
contained in the paper that I sent you a few days ago.
(A natural strategy against climate change). Several of the other questions I 
recognize, but are beyond my capacities to answer, any help is welcome. One 
fact is clear, fortunately. The Earth’s mantle is almost completely composed of 
olivine, thanks to plate tectonics, we won’t have to mine it at 30 km depth. 
Huge slabs have been pushed up, and are now at the surface, often with a thin 
cover of their own weathering crust, so there is more available than we will 
ever need to solve the problems of climate change and ocean acidification. I am 
not implying that we shouldn’t use other solutions as well.
I am happy to see that you all realize that the huge CO2 problem cannot be 
solved with a teaspoon of some miracle stuff, Olaf Schuiling


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Bill Stahl
Sent: maandag 26 januari 2015 23:15
To: [email protected]
Subject: [geo] Re: Energy Planning and Decarbonization Technology | The Energy 
Collective

I hesitate to add to what is already a leviathan of a thread... but here goes.
Assuming a carbon price were in effect, could coastal governments and 
landowners offset the cost of beach enhancement & sand replacement with 
CO2-sequestering sand? It would not  have to optimally efficient to be 
substantial.
On the face of it, getting permitted to use olivine on beaches seems a huge 
hurdle, but there is a already a tremendous amount of stirring-up of shallow 
coastal waters, budgeted and permitted. Transportation has already been 
arranged.   Based on my familiarity of the Jersey Shore, coastal towns throw 
enough money at replacing sand that will quickly erode away, so why not put it 
to some long-term use? (Perhaps Atlantic City's unemployed croupiers can be 
sent out stirring the beaches). I have no idea how to calculate the potential 
scale, but perhaps this has already been done.

Convince homeowners' associations to link CDR to property values and you've 
harnessed an unstoppable force...

And is dredging relevant here? Talk about mass-handling.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to