Okay so you no exposure to the configuration system. Do you have plans for a user interface contribution then - or is the advice to modify these xml files.
Originally the community module process was going to ask for a user interface contribution before being accepted into core (even if it just lists the available decorations). > The png-decorated format is present as an implementation detail so that > the decoration code can co-exist with the existing raster map producers. > Once the feature has been merged into the wms module every map producer > that inherits from DefaultRasterMapProducer will get layout support. Okay now I understand that part of your GSIP. >> And my question goes to the idea of not providing duplicate >> functionality through different mechanisms. > > Ah, I see. Yes, I plan on removing the existing watermark code and > leaving the watermark handling to the decoration layout code. Thanks that sounds like a solid improvement. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
