Hi Andrea I believe it was part of ironing out the module system (ie a difference between a community module and a core contribution). Let me check: - http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+22+-+Community+Modules
Apparently I stand corrected; i will stop looking for this when reviewing future GSIPs. Jody On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> >> Okay so you no exposure to the configuration system. Do you have plans >> for a user interface contribution then - or is the advice to modify >> these xml files. >> >> Originally the community module process was going to ask for a user >> interface contribution before being accepted into core (even if it >> just lists the available decorations). > > What? Jody, there is no such a thing in the GSIP, and I don't remember > ever being there: > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+22+-+Community+Modules > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
