Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> I'm sceptical about this. Look at the 2.4.x release history: we >> have had no release since August 2007, yet there has been more than >> one reason to make more RCs. It's just that no one can spare >> the full day needed for a 2.4.x release (that's what it took >> me despite making the release from a NY machine with a blowing >> fast connection due to the confluence issues, build hiccups, >> and the plain fact that making all the announcements >> included in the release procedure takes a lot of time). >> > I had it down to 4 hours;
Wow... it took me 3 without the raft of announcements, which required another 1-2 (and then I had to redo the javadocs and figure out what was breaking aggregation) > but that was only because we were making > releases every month; when you leave > it alone for a while all the madness starts to creep back in. Personally > I am enjoying not bothering people > about maven versions every month (which is where most of the problems > were); but I do feel bad leaving the > user community without any useful milestones of 2.5.x. > > Last week a version of maven that was predictable was mentioned; perhaps > we could look into that > as an alternative (while it would not migrate away from maven it would > get us the benifits). > > Andrea thank you for making 2.4.0; > - the build hiccups - was there anything interesting? The javadoc generation thing, see other mail thread > - I know you tried to sort out the "unsupported" directory; thanks for > at least looking at that Eh... wasted a bit of time looking around for this one too... but could not see any easy solution. > - confluence has been really bad lately - perhaps we should migrate to > TOPP or Refractions hardware now that both are running a good version of > the system. I know confluence has not been Paul Ramsey's best friend in > the past; but the more recent version we have installed seems to be > doing very well (and a lot better than codehaus). It's an option indeed... or else we could move to osgeo... wondering if it's possible to migrate the contents to another wiki without getting killed by a manual export... Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
