Andrea you are correct; GeoAPI looks like it will be in a state of flux; we should watch a specific snashot for now; or tag the work.
Eclesia started looking at the SE1.1 specification which contains some additional functionality for Function (basically a default value if an implementation of the function cannot be found). Jody > Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > >> Its look like that a new method has been added in the Function interface >> (see attached diff), and GeoTools implementation do not yet implement it. >> >> Given that the documentation in the returns tag said "Optional", I >> assume that it is okay to just implement them as "return null" in GeoTools. >> > Sigh, that's why I asked for a proposal for the geoapi stuff... > this way you're going to break GT2 api without the proper process, > which is not acceptable. > > For the moment, if you really need to hack GeoApi hard, can't we deploy > a tagged release of geoapi and make geotools depend on that? > > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
