Comments inline...
--
Jody Garnett
On Sunday, 10 April 2011 at 7:01 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Justin I think I have managed to cover all your feedback in the
> > following: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Skip+GeoTools+3
> Hey Jody,
> just found time to read your proposal (yep, Saturday night finally).
>
> Generally speaking it works for me, the only thing raising eyebrowses
> is that it's going to add a concept (patch releases) that we never had
> for years and years.
Agreed we have only had them on occasion (occasions like last week).
> I don't think we're going to see many (any?) of them, though I may be wrong
> of course.
I agree they are a lot of work so I expect they need an unusual circumstance.
However with more
high level projects being based on GeoTools it may occur more often.
> Just to be clear, the project is still going to be versioned as a whole, we're
> not going to see module x at version 8.5.1 and module y at version 8.3.2
> right?
Correct.
Indeed part of this proposal was to update the developers guide to indicate
this. Previously (well currently)
it is written that modules have their own version numbers.
> Don't want to see that, it would make handling dependencies a royal mess.
>
Agreed.
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
