On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3. Assuming (1) should we simply add to the FilterVisitor interface breaking > direct implementations, or come up with subinterface or the like to capture > the temporal methods so that we do not break client code. If we do think the > latter is a good idea then perhaps it makes sense to do the same for filter > factory.
I don't know much about the temporal module, hopefully Simone and Daniele or Alessio will chime in (warning, this is a long weekend in Italy). As for the interfaces I agree with Jody, we still have scars from the last filter update, made half way and never completed (and still it is not complete, FilterCapabilities anyone?). Better move the interfaces you need among the api and break solid whatever needs to be broken, so that we don't have to spend the next year chasing temporal filters disappearing halfway in a style duplicator, a attribute visitor or a xml dumper (just to make an example). Cheers Andrea -- ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
