Is there a proposal page for this one? I was going to volunteer to update the 
documentation. 

-- 
Jody Garnett


On Monday, 6 June 2011 at 2:04 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:

> Ok, i bit the bullet on this one and just went and updated all the 
> FilterVisitor implementations as best I could. For some I was able to come up 
> with implementations based on the nature of the class... and for others for 
> which I don't know I just made all the methods throw 
> UnsupportedOperationException. The current patch can be found here:
> 
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2367
> 
> Now about gt-temporal Jody has requested that we roll the module into main 
> and api/opengis. I think I agree... one less module would be nice. I have not 
> heard back from anyone who has their name on hat module yet so unless someone 
> objects I will probably try to do that this week. 
> 
> Oh and also btw, while it is not present in the patch I have also implemented 
> all the XML bindings for the new temporal classes... The reason they are not 
> on the patch is because they are mixed in and require a bunch of changes that 
> are on the current wfs2 branch. So breaking them out into a clean patch will 
> take some work... will do that this week. 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com 
> (mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >  You are of course correct. We should ask module maintainers both to review 
> > and also if they have time to help. And for those that do have time write 
> > their name in the tasks list. I am mostly interested in maurico's feedback 
> > with respect to CQL as I don't feel comfortable updating that code on my 
> > own.
> > 
> >  Jody
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  On 03/06/2011, at 5:38 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it 
> > (mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it)> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com 
> > > (mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > >> The other thing is to list a task for each module; as each module 
> > >> maintainer
> > >> should be able to update their own section. You know team work...
> > >
> > > Right, at the same time nobody can force the maintainer into doing work
> > > he has not agreed to.
> > >
> > > Teamwork is nice when shared, otherwise it's just one party unilaterally
> > > offloading work to others.
> > > As a real busy person I get very much upset when that happens, my previous
> > > suggestions were trying to get a decent balance between mission impossible
> > > (one person doing everything) and maintainers being forced to do something
> > > they do not have reason to work on.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Andrea
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > Ing. Andrea Aime
> > > GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> > > Tech lead
> > >
> > > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> > > 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> > > Italy
> > >
> > > phone: +39 0584 962313
> > > fax: +39 0584 962313
> > >
> > > http://www.geo-solutions.it
> > > http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
> > > http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
> > > http://twitter.com/geowolf
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to