Okay we are good to go:

- GeoTools: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1670
- GWC: no change
- GeoServer: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2628

--
Jody Garnett

On 9 November 2017 at 12:31, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think I have addressed the remaining feedback on the pull request.
>
> Andrea if I understand your feedback is addressed, but we need some
> "trivial changes" in GWC and GeoServer mentioned above - do you have those
> changes on a branch?
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 8 November 2017 at 08:02, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, considering the proposal passed :)
>>
>> I will volunteer to make a milestone release, since Java 9 is already
>> available.
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 7 November 2017 at 16:15, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> So after a month we have:
>>>
>>>    - Andrea Aime +1
>>>    - Ben Caradoc-Davies +1
>>>    - Christian Mueller
>>>    - Ian Turton +1
>>>    - Justin Deoliveira
>>>    - Jody Garnett +1
>>>    - Simone Giannecchini
>>>
>>> We have no -1 votes, thanks for the review Andrea.  Justin, Christian,
>>> Simone do you have any feedback or can we consider this motion passed?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 3 October 2017 at 14:31, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a follow up to today's meeting, please consider and vote on the
>>>> following proposal:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/FactoryRegistry-Re
>>>> factoring-for-Java-9-Compatibility
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to