The GEOS dependency is not a long-term challenge, nor spatialite's
licensing - you could write a clean-room implementation of both and they
would be much-appreciated. But I don't think anyone _will_ write a
clean-room implementation unless there's a good reason to, and thus the
chicken-and-egg problem of adoption versus implementation. Standardizing
abstract file formats without easily-used implementations is not useful:
formats need to prove their usefulness through real-world success, or
everyone will implement their own.

Also, bringing in Spatialite means that you aren't just standardizing a
binary format - you're pulling in the OGC SFS spec or something similar for
access: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfs

It looks like Spatialite has gone from GPLv3 to MPL, which might be an
improvement.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jaak Laineste <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 09.04.2012, at 20:27, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
>
> > On Lunes, 9 de abril de 2012 19:11:29 Eric Wolf escribió:
> >> I suspect that this very conversation was what originally spurned Frank
> >> Warmerdam to write the first version of GDAL/OGR. Instead of a universal
> >> file format, why not just build a universal translator?
> >
> > For me, "interoperability" means "I can run ogr2ogr against it" :-D
>
> +1. And to make this happen, please describe your format in plain text, in
> simple English. That's our interoperability standard.
>
>  There are many excellent reasons why we will always have different
> formats for different needs, but as long as you can provide clear and well
> usable interface code for it, or description is clear enough so I can
> implement it, then it is just fine. Feel free even invent new file formats.
>
> Jaak
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to