Rich Gibson writes: > Having a single point for an audio recording is probably a good > simplification, but it sort of bugs me. I often do sound recording > while I'm moving.
But what are you talking ABOUT? At any one moment, you are looking in a certain direction and are at a certain position. If georeferenced audio makes sense, then it makes sense because you were *there*. If you move somewhere else and start talking about that location, you should stop that recording and start a new one. That will cause a new georeference to be made. You could spend ten minutes talking about the thing you saw when you started talking. The only way I can see your new location being important to anyone is if you start talking about it. If you were in Fort Wayne, Indiana and started a georeferenced audio recording talking for the next hour about Fort Wayne, Indiana, who cares where you went after that unless you mention it in the recording? You could simply start a voice recording, and keep running it for the next five hours, then post-process it by trimming silence, and by making a note when you reference your current location in the audio. Seems more reasonable to start a recording at the location you're talking about, restart a new recording whenever you reference your location, and stop recording when you have no more to say. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | When immigration is Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | outlawed, only criminals 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | will immigrate. Illegal Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | immigration causes crime. _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
