Rich Gibson writes: > On 6/8/06, Russ Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rich Gibson writes: > > > Having a single point for an audio recording is probably a good > > > simplification, but it sort of bugs me. I often do sound recording > > > while I'm moving. > > > > But what are you talking ABOUT? > > Maybe I am misreading your point, but it seems sort of hostile...that > SHOUTING and all. Correct me if I am just being too sensitive.
Not meaning to be hostile. If I'm going to be publishing a standard for georeferencing audio (and nobody else seems to be doing so), then I want to publish a good one. > Assuming I am reading you right, your point is that voice recordings > are created by individuals who are actively aware of, and managing, > the recording process. That does not seem to match > my experience of the medium. Above, you said "I often do sound recording while moving." That sounds to me like you're actively aware of and managing the recording process. > But there are many many circumstances where that just doesn't seem to > match what is happening. Like what? I can't imagine any circumstance in which a path would be more useful than a point. Perhaps, as Tom suggested, it would be better for the audio to be continuous, with the point merely being inserted out of band into the audio stream. I agree with you that having an audio file and a movement track correlated is better than not having the movement information. I think it would be better to have begin/end markers that says "this segment of audio discusses this location". -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | When immigration is Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | outlawed, only criminals 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | will immigrate. Illegal Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | immigration causes crime. _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
