Hello Jonas, do you mean Python interface as in GHDL + Cocotb?
I think many of the GHDL users (including me :) ) are looking
forward to use Cocotb testbenches with GHDL again. As far as
I know, the Cocotb interface uses new, yet unimplemented,
VHPI features.
Another open idea (and not filed as an issue in the bug tracker)
is to specify which signals should be dumped into waveform files.
Reducing the signal count saves disk space, speeds up simulation
(less I/O work) and speeds up waveform viewers like GTKWave :).
Regards
Patrick
-----------------------------------
Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft
Technische Universität Dresden
Fakultät Informatik
Institut für Technische Informatik
Lehrstuhl VLSI-Entwurfssysteme, Diagnostik und Architektur
01062 Dresden
-----Original Message-----
From: Ghdl-discuss [mailto:ghdl-discuss-boun...@gna.org] On Behalf Of Jonas
Baggett
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 5:17 PM
To: Andrey Gursky <andrey.gur...@e-mail.ua>; GHDL discuss list
<ghdl-discuss@gna.org>
Subject: Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Collaboration in the GHDL project
Hello,
I can have a look at the bug tracker and work on the FST waveforms dumper. What
needs to be done ?
If I understand well, making à python interface will allow to simulate a system
with some parts written in vhdl and other parts written in python. And also if
there would be a simulink clone written in python, you could for example
modelize à motor with it and then simulate the motor with its controller
written in vhdl, right ?
Jonas
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:21:39 +0200
Tristan Gingold<tging...@free.fr> wrote:
> On 13/06/16 00:07, Jonas Baggett wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am thinking about collaborating in this project. My name is Jonas
>> Baggett, I am an electronic engineer and I have 2 years of practice
>> working on VHDL projects. When I started to understand the
>> programming philosophy behind VHDL, I really find it interesting. At
>> that period I discovered Ada and I naturally liked this language
>> because of its similar programming philosophy.
>> I have already made simulations under GHDL of some of my projects
>> some time ago and really find that it is a promising software. So I
>> would like to participate in the improvement of this software. Where
>> do you think I can help you ? I believe this could be an interesting
>> challenge for me and as now I have only a temporary job not related
>> to my field, it will keep myself active in the field.
> Hello,
>
> if you look athttps://github.com/tgingold/ghdl there are many open
> issues: some are bugs to be fixed and others are enhancements.
> You can start from any of them.
> You can also work on the FST waveforms dumper, or something very
> different like interfacing with Python.
>
> Do not hesitate to subscribe to this mailing list and to ask any
> question.
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
