On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:12:57AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc, there has been no mobbing going on (despite your continous
Just about every of your mails you wrote that has anything to do with
gimp-perl contains some (usually little) amounts of FUD. It might not be
intentional, but it's scary that people like you have the need for this.
If you feel that I am ranting unwarranted then I cannot help you.
Despite me telling you a lot olf times ("rants"), you continue spreading
FUD. Since I regard you as the main gimp developer right now, I take this
as an official sign to really go away.
I mean, I told you... you give a shit and continue... What else can I do
to make you behave less anti-social?
> ranting perhaps). There are two reasons for moving gimp-perl into a
> separate module:
I don't question these reasons at all, btw. Moving gimp-perl, however, is
not the reason why I felt mobbed at all.
> (2) There are a couple of severe problems with the build that have
I didn't know this (but I don't use the bugtracker, since despite a lot of
tries I never got an account there, so it's rather useless for me).
> I expect that some of these problems are more easily fixed in a
> separate module since integration of the perl build environment
> into the GIMP build environment has proven to be non-trivial.
Well, this is true, but this is also partly because people who go in and
change things fix most of the plug-ins but don't even attempt to do a
one-line variable change inside gimp-perl.
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
Gimp-developer mailing list