On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:27:44PM -0500, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the - vs _ use in function names by C vs. Script-Fu historical (as in
> typical of the respective languages)?
Yupp.
> values for plug-ins based on different languages? DB Browser shows
> GIMP_RGB_IMAGE for an image type (for C) but its only RGB-IMAGE for
> Script-Fu scripts and I have no idea off-hand what it would be for Perl
> plug-ins (a third set of enums?).
Just FYI, perl uses the enums.pl from the gimp core which lists all the
enums. It does, however, do this:
$const =~ s/^GIMP_//;
i.e.., strip the GIMP_-prefix, so the contants are the names with "_"
(easier to type in perl than "-"), but withouth the prefixes. Looks like
a third set to me.
(Also, perl isn't updated automatically, you have to run a script, so it
might be sightly out of sync).
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
