> Let's see. We have GIMP 2.2 done and are preparing to switch to GEGL.
> At this point you are trying to propose a kludge? Sorry, but I am not
> going to read any further...
Well, the most recent ChangeLog entry for gegl is dated 3-25-04, and
if it is nearly ready to use, then the CVS archive and the gegl web
page are very misleading. Am I missing something?
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu
Gimp-developer mailing list