William Skaggs wrote:

Sven wrote:

Let's see. We have GIMP 2.2 done and are preparing to switch to GEGL.
At this point you are trying to propose a kludge? Sorry, but I am not
going to read any further...

Well, the most recent ChangeLog entry for gegl is dated 3-25-04, and
if it is nearly ready to use, then the CVS archive and the gegl web
page are very misleading.  Am I missing something?

You're missing all the brainpower Øyvind Kolås has put into gggl and oxide while evaluating concepts that will get into GEGL and XCF2. See http://pippin.gimp.org for more information.


The GIMP > http://www.gimp.org      | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
    Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org     | .de: http://gimpforum.de
Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org |
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to