William Skaggs wrote:
Let's see. We have GIMP 2.2 done and are preparing to switch to GEGL. At this point you are trying to propose a kludge? Sorry, but I am not going to read any further...
Well, the most recent ChangeLog entry for gegl is dated 3-25-04, and if it is nearly ready to use, then the CVS archive and the gegl web page are very misleading. Am I missing something?
You're missing all the brainpower Øyvind Kolås has put into gggl and oxide while evaluating concepts that will get into GEGL and XCF2. See http://pippin.gimp.org for more information.
-- The GIMP > http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org | _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer