Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's slower, measurable and reproducible slower.
> As a benchmark I used a gradient fill in a 3000x3000px (68.8M)
> image. I get consistently times of 8s for 1 thread and between
> 9.2s and 9.6s for 2 threads. With a running application, after a
> restart -- doesn't matter.
> What is strange though, is that it only seems two use one CPU
> for both threads; maybe a stupid gthread implementation?
What version did you test? What's the last ChangeLog entry?
Gimp-developer mailing list