On 3/21/06, Martin Nordholts wrote:

> >GIMP does not attempt to be Photoshop nor to be like Photoshop.
> Well, I think it should! If there is any software today that has potential
> to be a PS counterpart, it is GIMP. I mean why, would we not want it to be
> Photoshop?

It's so simple that I fail to understand, why so many people can't
figure it out: innovation is about making difference, not copying. You
are doomed to fail if you try to make a great tool by carbon copying

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to