[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree there's not much point in having a complex script like 630 lines  
> of proprietary code and reporting it as a GIMP bug. If there is an leakage  
> issue here , that this rather extencive use is bringing to light, it  
> certainly ought to be fixed but a simple test case that can be published  
> is needed.

I plan to add a loop to invoke the script multiple times. When I am able to 
reproduce the problem I will look at converting the script to Script-Fu. By 
converting it to Script-Fu, which has had a lot of recent attention, it should 
help determine whether the problem is in GIMP or the gimp-perl binding.

-- 
Cheers!

Kevin.

http://www.ve3syb.ca/           |"What are we going to do today, Borg?"
Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172      |"Same thing we always do, Pinkutus:
                                 |  Try to assimilate the world!"
#include <disclaimer/favourite> |              -Pinkutus & the Borg
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to