[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree there's not much point in having a complex script like 630 lines
> of proprietary code and reporting it as a GIMP bug. If there is an leakage
> issue here , that this rather extencive use is bringing to light, it
> certainly ought to be fixed but a simple test case that can be published
> is needed.
I plan to add a loop to invoke the script multiple times. When I am able to
reproduce the problem I will look at converting the script to Script-Fu. By
converting it to Script-Fu, which has had a lot of recent attention, it should
help determine whether the problem is in GIMP or the gimp-perl binding.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we going to do today, Borg?"
Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |"Same thing we always do, Pinkutus:
| Try to assimilate the world!"
#include <disclaimer/favourite> | -Pinkutus & the Borg
Gimp-developer mailing list