On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 10:02:29PM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the swapping routines could be optimized specially for those data
> (I have no idea if this is done currently) and perform better than the
> systems routine.
Last time I looked, swap space in gimp is managed on a first come first
server basis, i.e. no special layouting. It should not perform worse than
linux� swapping, which is much worse in some respects.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Re: tile cache size Austin Donnelly
- Re: [gimp-devel] Re: tile cache ... Simon Budig
- Re: [gimp-devel] Re: tile ca... Tuomas Kuosmanen
- Re: [gimp-devel] Re: til... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Tile Cache Size Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
- Re: [gimp-devel] Re: Tile Ca... Simon Budig
- Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tim Mooney
- Re: Re: Tile Cache S... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Ca... Tim Mooney
- Re: Re: Til... Austin Donnelly
- Re: Til... Garrett LeSage
- Re: Re:... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Til... Marc Lehmann
