> He asked this very mailing list. [See attached] For just 
> one link. And while only Dr. Bunks can authoritatively 
> state the response he received, apparently it was zip.

It was never my point to say that the situation is perfect as is.
The only reason why I spoke up was that I wanted to speak for 
gimp.org. If there's a chance to get new people, new ideas, new 
spirit into gimp.org then the time is now.

> Perhaps only the IRC is the proper forum for gimp administrivia...

Sometimes it is, perhaps it shouldn't be. Everything can be 

> On the other hand, perhaps this is why we really, truly need 
> a gimp.org  webmistress/master - or a group that can make the role
> function - so as to realize requests such as this. That is the 
> true issue. As any number of posters have observed, bits can 
> live anywhere - who cares where they live. Sourceforge. gimp.org.
> Anyplace is fine by me. 

I do not at all insist on staying with the gimp.org server, but
I'd really like to see a more uniform namespace. And I do agree
wholeheartly with you that we need a group of people feeling 
responsible for gimp.org. 

> -------- Original Message --------
> Received: by u2.farm.idt.net for gosgood(with pop daemon (v1.21 1997/08/10) Thu Apr 
>13 20:35:10 2000)
> <snipped...>
> What do folks think of adding either of these two resources to the Gimp?
>   <Toolbox>/Xtns/Web Browser/Gimp-Savvy.com     --> http://gimp-savvy.com/
>   <Toolbox>/Xtns/Web Browser/Grokking the GIMP  --> http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/

I think it's a very good idea and as soon as those routers decide 
that I may reach cvs.gnome.org, I will commit this change. Sorry, 
that the mail was silently ignored in the first place. Sometimes 
it's hard to follow each and every mail on the list...

Salut, Sven

Reply via email to