On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:37:02PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:42:44PM +0200, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote:
> > >2) I was in doubt if it was better adding a new "What's new with GIMP 2.8"
> > >    leaving the old section renamed into "What was new with GIMP 2.6" but
> > >    maybe is an overkill...
> > >
> > >Please _say_ what you _all_ think about it:
> > …
> > If the 2.6 documentation will be available in the future, there is
> > no reason to repeat it in the 2.8 version. In my opinion a "What's
> > new in 2.8" chapter will be enough. Perhaps two new chapters in
> > appendix A instead: "What's new in 2.6?" and "What's new in 2.8?"
> > would satisfy the curious user.
> 
> Oh my! You are right! I just need to move the whats-new in the appendix 
> history and change its name in history-26.xml ...

Doing exactly this I just noted that the already translated strings in
one .po file do not magically ;-) move from one file to another...
(from introduction to appendix...)

I need a way to avoid to create uneeded work to other translators...how
can I move all those strings for _all_ the languages .po files?

Any hint?

-- 


Marco Ciampa

+--------------------+
| Linux User  #78271 |
| FSFE fellow   #364 |
+--------------------+
_______________________________________________
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-docs-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list

Reply via email to