On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:42:44PM +0200, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote:
> >2) I was in doubt if it was better adding a new "What's new with GIMP 2.8"
> >    leaving the old section renamed into "What was new with GIMP 2.6" but
> >    maybe is an overkill...
> >
> >Please _say_ what you _all_ think about it:
> …
> If the 2.6 documentation will be available in the future, there is
> no reason to repeat it in the 2.8 version. In my opinion a "What's
> new in 2.8" chapter will be enough. Perhaps two new chapters in
> appendix A instead: "What's new in 2.6?" and "What's new in 2.8?"
> would satisfy the curious user.

Oh my! You are right! I just need to move the whats-new in the appendix 
history and change its name in history-26.xml ...

-- 


Marco Ciampa

+--------------------+
| Linux User  #78271 |
| FSFE fellow   #364 |
+--------------------+

_______________________________________________
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-docs-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list

Reply via email to