On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> I don't understand this statement, last sentence. RAW support for/in gimp
> is provided by the same decoder most of the commercial apps utilize,
> dcraw. And is updated much more frequently and w/o cost compared to the
> "commercial" apps.
Only if you mean DCRaw. Because UFRaw development pretty much
stagnated. Two releases in last two years. Compare that to ACR.
gimp-user-list mailing list