On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:47 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: [...] > What do you think would be a reasonable largest size multiplier > (as opposed to actual brush size)? The current value is 1000.0 - > in the previous version it was 10.0.
I used to patch GIMP to set the max _size) 1000 because the built-in values were really really tiny when working on 2400dpi print images. I didn't usually need a brush bigger than quarter of an inch for what I was doing. But I loved the logarithmic controls. > Maybe, simply having the largest brush size as a value in preferences > could make up for all use cases. An input device preference to say, "behaves logarithmically" might work. The edit/Input Devices dialogue has a place for a "curve" that might work for this, although I can't test it because it says "this device has no curve" for me even for my USB mouse which is quite rounded actually. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml Co-author, 5th edition of "Beginning XML", Wrox, July 2012 _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
