On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Simon Budig wrote: > What would you say to > > "We did it this way for reasons x, y, and z, but we recognize that > what you're asking isn't like the broken spacebar comic. You have > options a and b now, and we're thinking about some even better > approaches in the future, but we won't revert to the old behaviour." > > Because this is what we said in the past. Over and over again.
I would say: okay, cool. But that's not what I've been seeing. It's largely along the lines of "you just don't understand that your way causes data loss". The current "options a and b" have a lot of rough edges. The Export Clean script makes the UI have even more cluttered "save" options, and it doesn't re-prompt for JPEG options, which I very much want it to do. And Overwrite is pretty close, but it doesn't mark images as clean, so I get confused about what I've saved already. I can live with those things, but I hate to have to explain them to other people. So, sure. I'd also like to hear more about the ideas for better approaches in the future. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
