By saying "despite the developers attempts otherwise", are you implying that
the devs are actually trying to make GIMP worse? I know that this may sound
beyond insane to a person such as yourself, but I don't think that's the case
And if you're so dissatisfied with "the best tool for working with images",
take Patricks advice, "Use something else and go away!"
Sent from my iPod
On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:36 PM, "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" <jnagyjr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/19/13 17:17, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
>>> On 07/19/13 17:10, Kasim Ahmic wrote:
>>>> I could ask you the same thing. Yes, if you SAVE the image, you'll
>>>> have all the layers intact. However, if you EXPORT the image, all the
>>>> layers are merged.
>>> That is a new and unexpected behavior.
>> Have you actually seen GIMP 2.8 up close? :) It's how it's been
>> working since early 2.7.x days, for the past 3+ years.
>>> What else have you folks changed?
>> You mean, what else we have improved? :)
> No, this is not an improvement. More developer snobbery, thinking they know
> more than the average user. Disgusting. Unfortunately GIMP is still the best
> tool for working with images, despite the developers attempts otherwise.
> Yours in Christ,
> Joseph A Nagy Jr
> "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
> is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
> Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address: email@example.com
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list