Liam wrote: >This is probably because the default downscaling method changed.
What you mean with "default downscaling method"? Interpolation alghorythm? >Well, you didn't say that before. However, I do believe the code Actually, I did in original message and repeated it afterwards in other messages, if it matters. >changed. I think in 2.6 the dialogue was misleading as Cubic was used >for downscaling in that case. ?? I don't understand, what you mean here. Anyway, both Cubic and Sinc interpolation methods were much better in 2.6, so it does not matter, was dialog misleading or not. Wbr, Gunnar -- wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: [email protected] List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
