Liam wrote:

>This is probably because the default downscaling method changed.

What you mean with "default downscaling method"? Interpolation alghorythm?

>Well, you didn't say that before. However, I do believe the code 

Actually, I did in original message and repeated it afterwards in other
messages, if it matters.

>changed. I think in 2.6 the dialogue was misleading as Cubic was used 
>for downscaling in that case.

?? I don't understand, what you mean here.

Anyway, both Cubic and Sinc interpolation methods were much better in 2.6, so it
does not matter, was dialog misleading or not.

Wbr,

Gunnar


-- 
wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to