I would be glad to try some of your files on my system. Shoot 'em over. 

I have tried and used Red Hat (various) and Mandrake. I like them both, but 
the one I like best is SUSE. I've used 7.3 and 8.0 (currently). I'm nobodies 
computer guru, so if I can use these distros anybody can.

I chose SUSE over the others because all my "stuff" ( hardware ) just seemed 
to work better with that distro. I spent less time diddling with my system, 
more time working.

On Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:31, Kevin Myers wrote:

> Under Windows I am running into a problem where the GIMP's pixel buffer
> seems to hit a 2GB file size limit when my gray scale TIFF image files
> excede roughly 400KB in size.  I'm guessing the buffer requires 5 bytes per
> pixel (RGB, transparency, ?), even though all of that isn't really needed
> for my images.
> I need to work with these images absolutely ASAP.  Because all of the
> machines involved are running Windoze, I was hoping to stick with that.
> However, it's starting to look like that is a hopeless cause given my poor
> porting skills and the apparant lack of interest of most gimp developers in
> addressing this problem under Windoze (at least in the near term).
> So, I'm starting to consider using Linux instead, and have two related
> questions:
> 1. Can anyone out there positively confirm that running the GIMP under a
> fairly recent version of Linux would avoid any inherent 2GB pixel buffer
> size limit?  I can provide some images for testing if anyone would like to
> volunteer...
> 2. Would anyone out there care to suggest a readily available commercial
> Linux distribution that is extremely easy to install, learn, and use for
> unsophisticated users with primarily Windblows experience?
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> s/KAM
> _______________________________________________
> Gimp-user mailing list
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to