Hi Fred - Thanks for the info. Just encountered some rather surprising results on my own system, and sent you a separate note regarding that. Your results are similar to what I experienced previously on my system, but at around 400MB instead of 273MB. FWIW, I have 1.5GB of RAM on my Win 2K based system. Now I am even more confused! I'll do some more testing and let you know what I figure out...
Thanks again, s/KAM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Bazolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:30 AM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Image Size Limits Kevin, I may be able to save you the trouble. While I was waiting, I went ahead and just tried to make some 400 MB tiff files. I got as high as 273MB and my system didn't like it, but it did it. Above that, the GIMP just died and went away - literally! I set the preferences so as to allow as much free memory as possible but that's the best I'm able to do. So I wonder, is there some sort of ~300 MB limit with tiff files, or is it just my system, or the way I had things set up. Don't know. I was using color tiffs if that is useful. On Thursday 09 January 2003 00:26, Kevin Myers wrote: > Hi Fred - > > Fortunately, it isn't actually necessary to use a 400+MB file to test for > the problem. I am uploading a 500M pixel file to an ftp site that I will > point you to shortly. This file is 1 bit per pixel and using group 4 > compression is only about 6MB in size. Hopefully that will download a lot > faster, and it will still trigger the 2GB pixel cache limit if it exists > (500M pixels * 5 bytes per pixel = 2.5GB). > > Thanks for your help! > > s/KAM > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fred Bazolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "gimp users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Image Size Limits > > > Whew! That would be a test of my system! > > Like I mentioned earlier, the largest files I ever tried to work with were > about 100 MB, and although it worked it was too annoying to bother with. > > But it would be fun to try a 400 mb file. I could just set the preferences > parameters really high, close down everything else and see what happens. > > It will take a few minutes just to download a 400 mb file! > > On Thursday 09 January 2003 00:11, Kevin Myers wrote: > > Sorry Fred and all, my apologies, 400KB was a serious typo. That should > > have read 400MB! > > > > s/KAM > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fred Bazolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "gimp users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP Image Size Limits > > > > > > I am curious about your file sizes though: 400 KB doesn't sound all that > > big; > > actually, that sounds pretty small. Also, I'm not very technical so bear > > with > > me, but isn't 5 times 400 KB about 2.0 MB? What am I missing here? > > > > On Wednesday 08 January 2003 23:31, Kevin Myers wrote: > > > Under Windows I am running into a problem where the GIMP's pixel buffer > > > seems to hit a 2GB file size limit when my gray scale TIFF image files > > > excede roughly 400KB in size. I'm guessing the buffer requires 5 bytes > > > > per > > > > > pixel (RGB, transparency, ?), even though all of that isn't really > > needed > > > > for my images. > > > > > > I need to work with these images absolutely ASAP. Because all of the > > > machines involved are running Windoze, I was hoping to stick with that. > > > However, it's starting to look like that is a hopeless cause given my > > > poor porting skills and the apparant lack of interest of most gimp > > > developers > > > > in > > > > > addressing this problem under Windoze (at least in the near term). > > > > > > So, I'm starting to consider using Linux instead, and have two related > > > questions: > > > > > > 1. Can anyone out there positively confirm that running the GIMP under > > > a fairly recent version of Linux would avoid any inherent 2GB pixel > > > buffer size limit? I can provide some images for testing if anyone > > > would like to volunteer... > > > > > > 2. Would anyone out there care to suggest a readily available > > > commercial Linux distribution that is extremely easy to install, learn, > > > and use for unsophisticated users with primarily Windblows experience? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > > > > > s/KAM > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gimp-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gimp-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gimp-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user