On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:15:36PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: > > > while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or > > individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything, > > not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to > > read psd to a minimum to force people away from stealing and using > > photoshop. it would make sense if you look at it like a war. > > I'd say quite contrary. Giving the abilkity to read PSD will make it > possible for people to convert their old work and give them a way to > "escape". > heh, weird. usually i am the optimistic one. :)
> > THEN i spent a week following things on #gimp some. there was lots of > > talk and exchange of facts about the gimp raw plug-in. i haven't seen > > anything here about the raw plug-in, but i did see that Adobe has > > released an updated raw thing themselves. > > > > all this stuff, and i just got to sit back and ask myself, whatsup? > > > > Jakub, do you know whatsup with all this? > > As for the raw format (DG, Digital Negative), Adobe did the right thing > and published the spec. [1] > > > [1] - http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html, > http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/license.html > okay, that is cool. better to have an enemy who is somewhat healthy and plays fair! carol _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
