On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:15:10PM +1100, Owen Cook wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:56:57PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 17:52]:
> > > >
> > > > 5) look at /etc/ldconfig and make sure that "/usr/local/lib/" is in the
> > > > list of paths there, if it isn't, add it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > there is *no* /etc/ldconfig in the SUSE distros. There is an
> > > executable, /sbin/ldconfig.
> > >
> > heh, well. any clue the reason they did that?
> Same in Ubuntu, the man ldconfig reads in part
> ldconfig should normally be run by the super-user as it may require
> write permission on some root owned directories and files. If you use -r
> option to change the root directory, you don't have to be super-user
> though as long as you have sufficient right to that directory tree.
> So ldconfig as an executable is rightly placed in /sbin
> However I think you are getting mixed up with /etc/ld.so.conf
> I don't have one, but ldconfig 'still works' There is a ld.so.cache
> /sbin/ldconfig is a binary file, so can't quickly tell what it is reading
i am fairly consistent with this typo.
thanks for the help. i should write sentences maybe:
"ld.conf.so is the configuration file, ldconfig is the application that
needs the configuration file."
honestly, when needed which is not very often, i know it is in /etc/ and
starts with an l. the naming is such that i can figure it out from
thanks for the fix to what i wrote and you are welcome to the laugh i
Gimp-user mailing list