Bob Meetin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> And the really befuddling baffling part is that with some of the stock 
> images I looked at Gimp seems to read their resolution fine.  So I am 
> guessing that with these stock images there is some image manipulation 
> going on, then gimp is correctly reading for them?

I suspect that the resolution is stored in two places: The Jpeg header
and the exif information. My gut feeling tells me, that gimp relies on
the information in the jpeg header and other tools look at the exif

If these two places contain different information, this might explain
your observation.

              [EMAIL PROTECTED]    
Gimp-user mailing list

Reply via email to