Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 16:28 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote: > > >>> Having tried out Liquid Rescale I'm very impressed. But does anyone have >>> an idea about the size of image it can deal with in terms of memory >>> requirements (I presume the Gimp setting Tile Cache size)? >>> >>> I've crashed it with a 700MB jpg setting Tile Cache Size to 3 GB (using >>> Linux Mandriva 2007.0) >>> >> There should be best/worst-case estimates in the paper, but if not, it >> probably depends on the algorithm. >> > > It also very much depends on how the plug-in is implemented. If it > transfers the full image data from GIMP to the plug-in, then it's > basically unusable with large images. Unfortunately quite a lot of > plug-ins are implemented that way. > > > Sven > I don't see any information about the implementation. If that's the case, it's a great pity - it's a very nice plug-in :-(
Doug _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
